MITS AIR MITSWZ-28EC
IS ILLEGAL AND NON-COMPLIANT

Published Specifications

View the full PDF specification at innovacopycats.com/mitsair28-specs

Overview

The Mits Air MITSWZ-28EC is a residential mini-split unit marketed in Canada with a claimed nominal cooling capacity of 8,881 BTU and a claimed heating capacity of 7,895 BTU. A review of its published specifications and regulatory standing reveals multiple serious compliance failures under Canadian federal law, as well as technical inconsistencies that undermine the credibility of the manufacturer’s published data.

Failure to be listed in the NRCan Searchable Product List

Under Canadian federal regulations, all air-conditioning and heat-pump systems must be listed in Natural Resources Canada’s (NRCan) Searchable Product List before they can be legally imported, distributed, or sold. As of the date of this publication, the MITSWZ-28EC does not appear in that database under any applicable product category — including Room Air Conditioner, Heat Pump, or Packaged Terminal Heat Pump (PTHP).

This absence alone constitutes a violation of federal law, independent of any other deficiency identified in this analysis.

Failure to meet NRCan Minimum Efficiency Requirements

Canadian federal regulations establish minimum efficiency thresholds for units in this capacity class. Depending on classification, the MITSWZ-28EC would be required to meet one of the following:

Mits Air publishes neither a SEER2 nor a CEER for cooling, and no HSPF2 for heating. Instead, the company publishes EER and COP values — metrics that do not satisfy Canadian regulatory requirements and cannot be used as substitutes for the mandated ratings. The absence of any compliant efficiency rating renders the unit illegal to sell, install, or use in Canada, regardless of its actual performance.

The Zymbo Connection

The MITSWZ-28EC is manufactured by Zymbo, which markets the identical unit as the WZ-28EC. The two products share the same compressor, coil geometry, refrigerant charge, airflow path, and chassis. The only distinguishing feature is the nameplate.

A direct comparison of the published specifications from both companies reveals figures that are physically inconsistent:

Let’s compare the data from the manufacturer, Zymbo to Mits Air:

WZ-28EC Inverter IIMits Air WZ-28ECChange between Zymbo and Mits Air
Cooling Capacity (BTU)9,0008,881Slightly Less Capacity−1.32%
Input Power Watts (cooling)745675Much less power−9.40%
EER (Btu/W)12.0813.16Higher Efficiency8.94%
Heating Capacity (BTU)8,5006,824Way less capacity−19.72%
Input Power Watts (heating)697689Slightly Less power−1.15%
COP (W/W)3.53.36Less efficiency−4.00%
RefrigerantR32/470g470No change
swipe to see more

This doesn’t add up.

Cooling: An Implausible Efficiency Gain

Mits Air’s figures show a 9.4% reduction in input power while cooling capacity falls by only 1.3% — producing an apparent 8.9% improvement in EER. On identical hardware with identical refrigerant, this is not physically achievable. A reduction in input power of that magnitude would require a corresponding reduction in capacity, not a trivial one.

Heating: An Implausible Efficiency Loss

The heating figures are even more inconsistent. Mits Air reports a 19.7% reduction in heating capacity compared to Zymbo, while input power is reduced by only 1.1%, and COP actually declines by 4.0%. Thermodynamically, a substantial reduction in output capacity on the same hardware, with nearly unchanged power consumption, is not possible. Furthermore, lower capacity at similar power input should generally produce higher efficiency, not lower. The direction and magnitude of these changes are irreconcilable with the laws of thermodynamics.

The only coherent explanation is that Mits Air’s published figures were not derived from laboratory testing. They appear to have been manually entered without a credible empirical basis.

Regulatory Classification and Labelling Violations

Because the MITSWZ-28EC carries no recognized efficiency rating — no CEER, no SEER2, no HSPF2 — it cannot satisfy the classification or labelling requirements under any applicable NRCan product category. To achieve legal status, the unit would require:

These ratings cannot be self-declared or calculated from published wattage figures. They must be derived from standardized test procedures conducted at an accredited facility.

Regulatory Violation Summary

Mits Air — MITSWZ-28EC
This product is illegal to distribute, specify, install, or use in Canada. The MITSWZ-28EC carries no compliant efficiency ratings, is absent from the NRCan product registry, and its published technical data contains internal contradictions that are physically impossible and inconsistent with any laboratory-derived measurements. The published EER and COP figures cannot be reconciled with the specifications of the identical Zymbo WZ-28EC — the unit’s own manufacturer — nor with basic thermodynamic principles.

One Million Dollar Guarantee

We back the statement that the Mits Air — MITSWZ-28EC cannot legally be sold, installed, or used in the United States and Canada with a One Million Dollar Guarantee.

No Compliant Efficiency Data Published

Required MetricPurposeMITSWZ-28EC Status
SEER2Mandatory cooling efficiency rating for heat pumpsNot published
HSPF2Mandatory heating efficiency rating for heat pumpsNot published
CEERMandatory cooling efficiency rating for room air conditionersNot published
EERPublished, but contradicts the specifications of the identical Zymbo WZ-28EC and violates thermodynamic principlesPublished but invalid
COPPublished, but contradicts specifications of the identical Zymbo WZ-28EC and violates thermodynamic principlesPublished but invalid
swipe to see more

The absence of compliant efficiency ratings is not an oversight. Published EER and COP figures that contradict those of the unit’s own manufacturer and that are inconsistent with physical reality are not measurements — they are fabrications. Under the Competition Act, both false statements and material omissions of required performance data are equally actionable.

Faking Test Results

ViolationUS Law ViolatedCanadian Law Violated
Mits Air has provided no evidence of testing at an SCC-accredited laboratory — no legitimate efficiency rating for the MITSWZ-28EC has ever been produced.10 CFR Part 429/430Energy Efficiency Regulations, 2016
Published EER and COP figures are internally contradictory and cannot be reconciled with the specifications of the identical Zymbo WZ-28EC or with basic thermodynamic principles.10 CFR Part 429/430; 18 U.S.C. § 1001Energy Efficiency Act; Energy Efficiency Regulations, 2016
The MITSWZ-28EC uses identical hardware to the Zymbo WZ-28EC, yet publishes efficiency and capacity figures that contradict those of its own manufacturer, making clear that no legitimate independent testing has been conducted.10 CFR Part 429/430; 18 U.S.C. § 1001Energy Efficiency Act; Energy Efficiency Regulations, 2016
swipe to see more

Selling Products That Should Not Be on the Market

ViolationUS Law ViolatedCanadian Law Violated
MITSWZ-28EC does not meet minimum efficiency standards — no certified data exists to demonstrate compliance with any applicable efficiency threshold.10 CFR Part 430MEPS under Energy Efficiency Regulations, 2016
Mits Air never listed the MITSWZ-28EC on NRCan's searchable product database, meaning the product was never legally cleared for import or interprovincial sale in Canada.NRCan Searchable Product Database; Energy Efficiency Act
MITSWZ-28EC was never certified by an accredited certification body and does not carry the mandatory compliance mark.DOE Certification under 10 CFR Part 429Standards Council of Canada Energy Efficiency Verification Mark
Mits Air never filed the required compliance reports with regulators before importing or selling the MITSWZ-28EC.DOE via CCMSNRCan Energy Efficiency Report
Contractors, specifiers, and consumers who source, install, or use this unit may expose themselves to regulatory and legal liability.10 CFR Part 430Energy Efficiency Act; Energy Efficiency Regulations, 2016
swipe to see more

Lying to Customers and Regulators

ViolationUS Law ViolatedCanadian Law Violated
Mits Air markets and sells the MITSWZ-28EC with published efficiency figures that contradict its own manufacturer's specifications and violate thermodynamic principles.10 CFR Part 429.12; 18 U.S.C. § 1001 — federal criminal offenceEnergy Efficiency Act — fines up to $10,000 per violation
Product literature and marketing materials violate classification and labeling requirements by omitting all mandatory compliance efficiency metrics.FTC Energy Labeling Rule, 16 CFR Part 305; DOE Labeling Requirements under 10 CFR Part 430NRCan Product Classification and EnerGuide Labeling Requirements under Energy Efficiency Regulations, 2016
By publishing figures that contradict those of the unit's own manufacturer, Mits Air misrepresents the performance capability of the MITSWZ-28EC to customers, dealers, regulators, and certification bodies.18 U.S.C. § 1001 — federal criminal offenseEnergy Efficiency Act offense
swipe to see more

Breaking Consumer Protection and Competition Laws

ViolationUS Law ViolatedCanadian Law Violated
Publishing efficiency and capacity figures that contradict the unit's own manufacturer and that are inconsistent with physical reality constitutes false or misleading representations in a material respect.FTC Act Section 5, 15 U.S.C. § 45; Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a)Competition Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-34
The deliberate omission of all compliant efficiency ratings is a material omission under the Competition Act, treated the same as a false statement and equally actionable.Competition Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-34
Maximum penalties for serious violations or refusal to take corrective action.FTC civil penalties up to $53,088 per violationEnergy Efficiency Act fines $10,000–$200,000
swipe to see more

Mits Air MITSWZ-28EC cannot legally be sold, installed, or used in Canada, and we back that statement with a One Million Dollar Guarantee.