SILKTECH ECOAURO 1.0
ARE ILLEGAL AND NON-COMPLIANT

Published Specifications

View the full PDF specification at innovacopycats.com/silktech-specs

Failure to be Listed in the NRCan Searchable Product List

In Canada, all air-conditioning and heat-pump systems must be listed in the NRCan database. In fact, it is illegal to import or sell a unit that is not listed. At the time of this publication, March 16, 2026, the Silktech EcoAuro 1.0 is not listed in the NRCan Searchable Product List.

Failure to Meet NRCan Minimum Efficiency Requirements

Silktech EcoAuro 1.0 has a published rated capacity of 8,000 BTU in its brochure. Under federal law, any 8,000 BTU heat pump in this class must meet a 13.4 SEER2 or 9.3 CEER minimum to be legally sold, installed, or used in Canada. The Silktech EcoAuro 1.0 doesn’t publish a SEER2 or CEER value in its documentation because the unit cannot meet the required 13.4 SEER2 or CEER when tested in a certified lab.

Illegal Rating

Silktech uses the wrong rating metric in their published documentation, EER instead of SEER2 or CEER, COP2 instead of HSPF2. Silktech publishes only an EER for cooling and a COP for heating. Neither EER nor COP is a legal rating for this product category. For a heat pump, federal law requires:

This alone renders the units illegal.

Illegal Misclassification

By using an EER instead of SEER2, Silktech is classifying EcoAuro 1.0 as PTHP, but it does not meet the PTHP definition under the Energy Efficiency Regulations. A lawful PTHP must have a wall sleeve: a separate unencased chassis, and through-the-wall mounting. The Silktech EcoAuro 1.0 lacks these traits. Misclassifying the EcoAuro 1.0 as PTHP by using EER is a direct violation of NRCan rules and is illegal.

Miscalculated Performance Numbers

Silktech misrepresents even the fabricated numbers it publishes for Silktech EcoAuro 1.0 and EcoAuro 2.0 in both heating and cooling.

In Cooling

For the EcoAuro 1.0 model:

Using their own watt input: 8,000 ÷ 750 = EER 10.67. Yet, Silktech publishes 10.91 EER. They fraudulently list the cooling capacity as 8,000 BTU and the EER as 10.91. When calculating the numbers, the EER of 10.67 is illegal. Can’t these cheaters do simple math??!!

Fraudulent and Fake Numbers

The 8,000 BTU capacity they claim in printed brochures and technical documents, along with the 10.91 EER rating for the EcoAuro 1.0 model, is fake and fraudulent. When tested in a lab, this unit will not produce 8,000 BTU and a 10.91 EER. So, even ignoring the misclassification and wrong ratings, the actual numbers they claim are fake.

Somehow, this claimed 8,000 BTU of cooling increases to 8,831 BTU when Silktech fraudulently publishes the data on the MAEDBS website. In heating, Silktech pulls the same fraud, increasing the capacity from 8,000 to 8,800 BTU. Both numbers are fabricated.

Here’s where it gets interesting. The manufacturer, Zymbo (China), lists numbers that differ significantly from those in Silktech’s brochure for the same unit.

Zymbo claims the same unit, called Clima Puro, has a higher capacity of 8,831 BTU and a different efficiency of 10.6 EER. What’s even more fascinating is that Zymbo’s own internal calculations are inconsistent.

Here’s what Zymbo publishes:

Using their own watt input: 8,831 ÷ 750 = EER 11.77. Yet Zymbo, the manufacturer, publishes an EER of 10.6.

Using their own watt input: 8,800 ÷ 3.412 (BTU to W) ÷ 700 = 3.68 COP. Yet, Zymbo, the manufacturer, publishes 3.35 COP.

Zymbo is manipulating the numbers. The numbers they initially published were too good to be true, so they simply “dumbed down” the efficiency and presented lower efficiency values.

When Silktech published its own figures, it used the real (but still fake) numbers that Zymbo publishes when uploading data to the MAEDBS website, then set the minimum SEER2 to 13.4 to make the data appear compliant.

Regulatory Violation Summary

Silktech — EcoAuro 1.0
This product is illegal to distribute, specify, install, or use in the United States and Canada. Silktech’s published cooling and heating efficiency numbers are fabricated, mathematically impossible, and directly contradict what proper testing would show. The EcoAuro 1.0 fails to meet DOE and NRCan minimum efficiency requirements under every applicable classification. Where these products appear in official databases, they do so with falsified data, which compounds rather than resolves their violations.

One Million Dollar Guarantee

We back the statement that the EcoAuro 1.0 cannot legally be sold, installed, or used in the United States and Canada with a One Million Dollar Guarantee.

Minimum Efficiency Requirements Not Met

MetricLegal Minimum RequiredSilktech’s StatusResult
SEER2≥ 13.4Numbers fabricated — listed on MAEDBS with fake dataFails
HSPF2≥ 6.7Numbers fabricated — listed on MAEDBS with fake dataFails
CEER / SEER2NRCan minimumNot listed on the NRCan databaseFails
swipe to see more

These ratings cannot be made up. They must be established through testing in a genuine laboratory under the correct DOE and NRCan test procedures. The fact that fabricated data has been submitted to official government databases does not constitute compliance — it constitutes fraud.

Database Status

DatabaseEcoAuro 1.0
DOE Compliance Certification Management System (CCMS)Not listed
MAEDBSListed with falsified data
NRCan Searchable Product ListNot listed
swipe to see more

Submitting falsified efficiency data to a government database is not a path to compliance. It is a separate and aggravated violation — constituting the filing of false information with a federal regulator.

Faking Test Results

ViolationUS Law ViolatedCanadian Law Violated
Silktech fabricated laboratory test data rather than conducting legitimate testing under the required industry methods, AHRI 210/240 and ASHRAE 3710 CFR Part 429Energy Efficiency Act; Energy Efficiency Regulations, 2016
Published cooling efficiency numbers for products are fabricated and mathematically impossible, and could not result from any legitimate test10 CFR Part 430Energy Efficiency Regulations, 2016
Published heating efficiency numbers for products are fabricated and mathematically impossible, and could not result from any legitimate test10 CFR Part 430Energy Efficiency Regulations, 2016
Published efficiency numbers contradict basic mathematics — the stated heating and cooling values are physically impossible10 CFR Part 430Energy Efficiency Regulations, 2016
Silktech uses illegal EER rating metrics instead of the legally required SEER2 (US) or CEER (Canada), mandatory since January 1, 202310 CFR Part 430Energy Efficiency Regulations, 2016
Silktech derived published performance ratings from non-compliant test conditions and failed to use the correct AHRI 210/240 and ASHRAE 37 test methods, rendering every efficiency rating ever published legally invalid10 CFR Part 429/430Energy Efficiency Regulations, 2016
Silktech submitted falsified efficiency data to the MAEDBS, constituting the filing of false information with federal regulators18 U.S.C. § 1001 — federal criminal offenseEnergy Efficiency Act
swipe to see more

Selling Products That Should Not Be on the Market

ViolationUS Law ViolatedCanadian Law Violated
EcoAuro 1.0 does not meet minimum efficiency standards, exposing every distributor and dealer carrying the products to joint legal liability10 CFR Part 430MEPS under Energy Efficiency Regulations, 2016
Product fails mandatory SEER2 minimum cooling efficiency thresholds because published numbers are falsifiedSEER2 under 10 CFR Part 430CEER under Energy Efficiency Regulations, 2016
The product fails the mandatory HSPF2 minimum heating efficiency thresholds because the published numbers are falsifiedHSPF2 under 10 CFR Part 430Energy Efficiency Regulations, 2016
EcoAuro 1.0 is listed in MAEDBS with falsified data — database presence with fake data does not constitute compliance and is an aggravated violation18 U.S.C. § 1001
The product is not listed in NRCan's searchable product database, meaning it was never legally cleared for import or interprovincial sale in CanadaNRCan Searchable Product Database; Energy Efficiency Act
The product was never certified by an accredited certification body, and neither carries the mandatory compliance markDOE Certification under 10 CFR Part 429Standards Council of Canada Energy Efficiency Verification Mark
Silktech violated product classification rules for the product, affecting which efficiency standards and test procedures applyDOE Product Classification Rules under 10 CFR Part 430NRCan Product Classification Rules under Energy Efficiency Regulations, 2016
swipe to see more

Lying to Customers and Regulators

ViolationUS Law ViolatedCanadian Law Violated
Silktech's efficiency and capacity ratings directly conflict with what government-certified testing would produce, and falsified data was submitted to official government databases10 CFR Part 429.12; 18 U.S.C. § 1001 — federal criminal offenceEnergy Efficiency Act — fines up to $10,000 per violation
Nameplates, product literature, and marketing materials display efficiency ratings using illegal EER metrics unsupported by any legitimate test data, violating both US and Canadian labeling requirementsFTC Energy Labeling Rule, 16 CFR Part 305; DOE Labeling Requirements under 10 CFR Part 430NRCan Product Classification and EnerGuide Labeling Requirements under Energy Efficiency Regulations, 2016
Silktech misrepresented the certification and compliance status of both products to customers, dealers, regulators, and certification bodies18 U.S.C. § 1001 — federal criminal offenseEnergy Efficiency Act offense
swipe to see more

Breaking Consumer Protection and Competition Laws

ViolationUS Law ViolatedCanadian Law Violated
False efficiency claims, illegal rating metrics, and misleading energy performance advertising — including the submission of falsified data to government databases — constitute deceptive trade practices exposing Silktech to regulatory action and civil lawsuits from competitors, including claims for damagesFTC Act Section 5, 15 U.S.C. § 45; Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a)Competition Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-34
Maximum penalties for serious violations or refusal to take corrective actionFTC civil penalties up to $53,088 per violationEnergy Efficiency Act fines $10,000–$200,000
swipe to see more